- By Rick
              Scarborough
 
          
         
        
          President
          and National Co-Chairman, 
			Vision
          America
        
        
        
        The Separation of God and State 
        
        In 1776 fifty-six courageous men signed the
        Declaration of Independence, which at the time was an act of treason
        against England. The second paragraph of the Declaration begins by
        stating.....�We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men
        are created equal, and are endowed by their Creator�..� 
        References to the Almighty are included throughout the
        document. That they believed in God, there can be no doubt. And it wasn�t
        just a ceremonial belief, but one which they held so deeply that they
        declared they were willing to��.�pledge our lives, our fortunes
        and our sacred honor�, to uphold. A price they subsequently were
        required to pay. 
        The Declaration listed 26 grievances against King
        George, whom they accused of demonstrating a �history of repeated
        injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment
        of an absolute tyranny over these states.� 
        Rereading the Declaration of Independence in
        preparation for this article reinforced my belief that the Courts in
        general, and particularly an elite group of activist Federal Judges, are
        now once again perpetrating tyranny upon the states. In 1776 the evil
        was perpetrated by a King. Today, it is done by an activist Judiciary,
        who are usurping power that is not granted by their respective State and
        Federal Constitutions. Increasingly this nation is looking less and less
        like the country our Founders fought to create and it will take the same
        resolve they demonstrated to reverse the moral freefall of the past four
        decades. If the courage that our Founders exhibited in 1776 can�t be
        found in leaders today, the culture war is lost. 
        Fortunately, for us, there are some Judges standing
        for traditional values who will not bow to these self appointed arbiters
        of the new morality. Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore is
        the brightest star in the firmament. He began his uphill battle to honor
        his God as a Jurist eleven years ago as a Circuit Judge and has become
        known as the �Ten Commandments Judge�, but as he is quick to point
        out, his battle is not about the Ten Commandments, but about whether or
        not the state will acknowledge God as God. 
        The Chief Justice of the Alabama Supreme Court was
        elected overwhelmingly by the Alabama voters, who knew how deeply he
        felt about the right of all Americans to freely pursue their faith in
        the public sector. He has been under continual assault by the ACLU and
        other groups dedicated to dismantling the true meaning of the First
        Amendment for more than a decade. 
        Chief Justice Moore has the responsibility and the
        authority to decorate the Alabama Supreme Court Building under the
        Alabama Constitution. Included in the items he selected for the building
        is a beautiful two and a half ton monument containing the Ten
        Commandments and selected quotes from our Nation�s history. It is the
        belief of Chief Justice Moore, as well as most other Americans, that the
        foundation of all Law is the Ten Commandments which God gave by
        revelation to Moses and recorded in the Bible. 
        The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals assigned a three
        Judge panel to hear arguments regarding the removal of the monument
        after a complaint was filed by the ACLU. On July 1 they issued their
        ruling which was adverse to Chief Justice Moore. The Chief Justice was
        then given twenty one days to appeal to the entire Eleventh Circuit. As
        of this writing the Chief Justice has made no indication that he will
        appeal 
        Because Chief Justice Moore cannot in good conscience
        remove the monument without compromising his strongly held faith, he
        will be in technical violation of a court order. This will trigger an
        investigation by the State Judicial Inquiry Commission. If they find
        that the Chief Justice has acted improperly, they have the power to
        remove him from the bench, while he appeals his case to the United
        States Supreme Court. 
        Please don�t overlook the reason Chief Justice Moore
        is in jeopardy of being removed from an office in which a majority of
        Citizens of Alabama elected him to serve; for refusing to remove a
        monument which contains the Ten Commandments. And why will he not remove
        them? Because he TRULY believes that God has revealed the foundation of
        all law through them and that to remove the monument would be to deny
        the God who is the revealer of the Ten Commandments. For Chief Justice
        Moore, this is a First Amendment issue. 
        Why does the Court take the position that the monument
        must be removed? Because the Chief Justice is exercising his faith in
        the public sector. He has abridged the �separation of church and
        state.� For the Eleventh Circuit Court it is a First Amendment issue.
        What does the First Amendment say? 
        
        � 
        
        Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
        religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the
        freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably
        to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. 
        
        � 
        
        Look for this phrase �separation of church and state� in the
        First Amendment. It is not there. If you concede that the First
        Amendment contains the principle of separation, when did church become
        God? We now see the Judiciary systematically removing God from the
        public sector in case after case. 
        No reasonable American could conclude that Chief Justice Moore is in
        violation of this first article of the Bill of Rights. The Federal
        Judiciary has turned this Amendment on its ear to provide cover for its
        assault on people of faith which began in earnest in 1947. They have
        been successful because no worthy opponent to their philosophical
        atheism has been willing to confront them, without regard to the
        personal cost it might extract. Many well meaning Christians have agreed
        to accept the crumbs which have fallen from the gods of the Federal
        Judiciary�s table who occasionally allow God to be acknowledged, but
        only as long as it is ceremonial in nature. Under such a view, we still
        have �In God we trust� on our coinage, but does anyone doubt that
        Barry Lynn of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, would
        allow school children to hold a dollar in their hands if he thought the
        children might take that phrase to heart? The reason the Eleventh
        Circuit is so adamant about the removal of this monument is that Chief
        Justice Moore has made it very clear in the hearings that he takes God
        to heart. And so do millions of other Americans. 
        Chief Justice Moore�s case brings the entire Culture War of the
        past four decades into one issue. In the Court record of the hearings
        the presiding Judge articulated the issue: ��the issue is can
        the state acknowledge GOD.� God in His infinite wisdom has
        accentuated the real issue in the very setting of the hearings, for on
        the fa�ade of the Federal Court building where the case has been heard
        is a sculpture of the Grecian goddess, Themis. I wonder why the ACLU,
        Southern Poverty Law Center or Americans United for Separation of Church
        and State, never sued for the removal of Themis? Could it be that no one
        takes Themis seriously? 
        To the question, �Can the state acknowledge God?� Judge Moore
        says not only �Yes!� But more importantly, �It must!�
        He realizes that to fail to do so wipes out hundreds of years of Western
        civilization based on the rule of law and ushers in an age where the law
        is whatever the presiding judge says it is. Just look at Supreme Court
        Judge Sandra Day O' Connor's flip flop on sodomy between 1989 and 2003. 
        Our nation�s morality isn�t being destroyed by �Activist Judges�;
        it is being destroyed by �Atheist Judges�, and it is time for
        God-fearing Americans to stand up and say��.Enough is Enough! 
        On August 16 at 10:00 am Vision America 21 will be sponsoring a rally
        on the steps of the Supreme Court building in Montgomery, Alabama at
        10:00 A.M. Thousands of Pastors, God-fearing Americans and elected
        officials will be there to express their support for Chief Justice Roy
        Moore. More importantly, we will be acknowledging our firm belief that
        the God of Chief Justice Roy Moore is our God as well, and the
        Constitution of the United States has not authorized Judges to forbid
        Americans to acknowledge Him in the public sector. �
     |